MCOLES State Licensing Practice Exam

What should an officer do if a minor is suspected of theft but was not caught in the act?

1. Let the minor go with a warning.

2. Make an arrest based on suspicion.

3. Gather evidence and develop a case for prosecution.

4. Question other suspects present.

The correct answer is: Gather evidence and develop a case for prosecution.

When a minor is suspected of theft but was not caught in the act, taking the appropriate procedural steps is crucial for ensuring that any potential case is handled correctly and justly. Gathering evidence and developing a case for prosecution is the most suitable response because it ensures that any actions taken are based on concrete, verifiable information rather than mere suspicion. In this scenario, the officer is tasked with building a legally sound case, which involves collecting evidence that can include witness statements, surveillance footage, or other pertinent details related to the theft. This process is essential, as it not only supports the integrity of the law but also provides a fair opportunity for the minor to be assessed based on the facts of the case rather than assumptions. While letting the minor go with a warning might seem lenient, it could undermine the seriousness of the alleged behavior and fails to address the potential need for intervention and accountability. Making an arrest based solely on suspicion would likely violate the principle of presumption of innocence and could lead to legal repercussions for the officer and the department. Questioning other suspects present could be part of the investigative process but should not be the sole focus without first establishing a solid foundation of evidence. Therefore, the action of gathering evidence and developing a case for prosecution aligns