MCOLES State Licensing Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) Exam with multiple choice questions and detailed explanations. Enhance your law enforcement career prospects with our comprehensive study guide!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

In the case of People v. Shankle, what was concluded about the officer's actions?

The evidence was deemed inadmissible
The officer asked the driver out of the vehicle voluntarily
The driver was not required to show ID
The officer's actions were deemed unlawful

The correct answer is: The officer asked the driver out of the vehicle voluntarily

The conclusion regarding the officer's actions in People v. Shankle indicates that the officer did not force the driver to exit the vehicle and instead asked the driver to do so voluntarily. This distinction is crucial because it implies that the officer was acting within the bounds of lawful interaction. When an officer requests a driver to step out of their vehicle without any exertion of force or coercion, it suggests adherence to legal protocols regarding public encounters and traffic stops. The voluntary nature of this request supports the idea that the officer's actions were appropriate in the context of their duties. In contrast, the other options imply either unlawful conduct or an infringement of rights, which was not supported by the findings in this case. Consequently, the determination that the request to exit the vehicle was voluntary is a key takeaway, underscoring the importance of understanding what constitutes a lawful versus unlawful request by law enforcement.